LATEST NEWS

Feb 2, 2026

Terrorism

Crime and Lawfare

Economy & Food Security

World-Affairs

Information warfare

Politics & Public Policy

Imran Khan in Epstein Files – Truth Exposed

Feb 2, 2026 | Current Affairs, Politics

Islamabad — Recent releases of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — often called the “Epstein files” — have sparked speculation in Pakistan, but no Pakistani nationals appear as clients, associates in criminal activities, or victims in the unsealed court records or related emails.

The files, stemming from civil lawsuits and investigations into Epstein’s sex trafficking network, primarily name high-profile international figures like former U.S. presidents, British royalty, and business leaders. Pakistani connections are limited to passing, non-incriminating references to former Prime Minister Imran Khan in Epstein’s personal emails and correspondence from others.

Key Highlights

  • Imran Khan is referenced in a 2018 email exchange where Epstein described him as a “major threat to peace” and “really bad news” shortly after his 2018 election victory — viewing him as potentially disruptive compared to other global leaders.
  • A separate 2013 email from a UN-linked official (Nasra Hassan) called Khan a “London society lion,” noting his social influence could aid Western-backed health initiatives like polio eradication in Pakistan — a descriptive diplomatic observation, not tied to Epstein’s crimes.
  • Claims linking Khan to Ghislaine Maxwell or Epstein’s network stem from a pre-2000s social photo (from Khan’s cricket days in London) and loose associations via Maxwell’s past circles — no evidence in files shows criminal involvement, meetings, flights, or allegations against him.
  • No other prominent Pakistanis (politicians, business figures, or officials) are named in client lists, flight logs, or abuse-related testimony in the unsealed documents.
  • Fact-checks and reports confirm Khan’s name does not appear in contexts of Epstein’s sex trafficking, underage exploitation, or direct personal ties.

References Remain Non-Criminal and Speculative

The mentions of Imran Khan appear in Epstein’s private opinions and third-party diplomatic chatter — not in victim statements, witness accounts, or evidence of wrongdoing. Epstein’s negative view of Khan’s rise seems rooted in political perceptions rather than personal acquaintance.

Legally, inclusion in the files does not imply guilt or wrongdoing — many named individuals were social or professional contacts with no proven involvement in crimes. Ethically, the documents highlight how powerful networks operate, but sensational claims without evidence risk unfair reputational harm. In Pakistan’s polarized context, such references often fuel political narratives rather than reveal new facts.

You May Like To Read: Shafi Jan Accuses Federal Gov’t of Tirah “Distortions”

This limited Pakistani footprint in the Epstein saga underscores that the core scandal centers on Epstein’s U.S. and international elite circle — not widespread involvement from Pakistani figures. Authorities and independent reviews continue to stress context over speculation when interpreting these releases.

Check out our latest video: