وفاقی شرعی عدالت
کراچی کے وکیل بیرسٹر علی طاہر نے 27 ویں ترمیم کو وفاقی شرقی عدالت میں چیلنج کردیا ،عدلیہ کی آزادی اور احتساب اسلام کے بنیادی اصول ہیں جو 27 ویں ترمیم میں ختم کردی گئی ہے ، 27 ویں ترمیم غیر اسلامی شقین کالعدم قرار دی جائیں صدر اور فیلڈ مارشل کو دیا گیا تاحیات… pic.twitter.com/xmMCDAEvWC— Shahid Hussain (@ShahidHussainJM) November 25, 2025
Key Arguments in the Petition
The lawyer contended that the amendment drastically shifts the balance of power in favour of the executive, undermines the independence of the judiciary, and entrenches military influence in constitutional matters — changes he described as “repugnant to the injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah”.Barrister Tahir argued that Islamic governance demands:
- Complete independence of the judiciary from executive and legislative control
- Strict accountability of rulers and judges to Allah and the people
- Equality before the law, with no privileged class enjoying lifetime immunity
He specifically criticised provisions granting lifetime immunity to the President and military leaders, calling them a direct violation of Quranic principles of equality and justice.
