Pakistan Rejects India’s ‘Illegal’ Suspension of Indus Waters Treaty at UNSC Debate

Jul 23, 2026 | International-Affairs, India

NEW YORK — Pakistan has categorically rejected India’s move to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), describing it as illegal under international law during a United Nations Security Council debate on natural resource governance.

Speaking at the session, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, cautioned against the weaponisation of shared water resources. He stressed that no country should use vital natural assets as tools of political coercion, especially when such actions violate binding treaty obligations that directly affect more than 240 million people.

Diplomatic Exchange at the UN Security Council

After remarks by Indian representative Harish Parvathaneni, who cited cross-border terrorism allegations to defend New Delhi’s position, Pakistan’s First Secretary Ansar Shah exercised the right of reply to counter the claims.

Diplomatic Representative Key Arguments & Legal Position Presented
Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad Framed natural resource governance within international law; highlighted the August 2025 Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruling that reaffirmed the IWT remains valid and fully binding.
First Secretary Ansar Shah Stated the IWT lacks provisions for unilateral abeyance; rejected terrorism claims and cited Indian sponsorship of proxy groups including the TTP, BLA, and Majeed Brigade.

Legal Standing and Regional Security Implications

The Pakistani delegation underlined that the August 2025 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration clearly upheld the treaty’s validity and its dispute settlement mechanisms. Shah warned that any attempt to alter water flows as a means to punish downstream populations would constitute a serious violation of international norms and pose a direct threat to regional stability.

Pakistan also reiterated its longstanding position on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, reminding the Security Council of its responsibilities under Article 25 of the UN Charter and emphasising that unilateral actions cannot change the legally recognised disputed status of the territory.